Wikidata:Property proposal/باب صرفي للأفعال العربية الثلاثية المجردة - Wikidata
Morphological category
[edit]
Return to Wikidata:Property proposal/Lexemes
Under discussion
| Description | Morphology of the Arabic triliteral verbs |
|---|---|
| Data type | Lexeme |
| Example 1 | ك ت ب (L2308) → 1st category (Q133366739) 2nd category (Q133369534) |
| Example 2 | ش ر ب (L1215988) → 1st category (Q133366739) 4th category (Q133369952) |
| Example 3 | ح س ب (L12112) → 1st category (Q133366739) 4th category (Q133369952) 5th category (Q133370261) 6th category (Q133370238) |
Motivation
[edit]
We are planning to import database that includes all patterns of the arabic verbs.--Michel Bakni (talk) 08:55, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion
[edit]
Support ForzaGreen (talk) 09:34, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]- Support --عبد الجليل 09 (talk) 14:21, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, Very useful property. Ahmed Naji Talk 19:19, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This information seems better placed on lexemes for the verbs themselves (possibly with conjugation class (P5186), in the way that Hebrew binyanim are currently indicated?), rather than on lexemes for their roots. Maybe @عُثمان: has other ideas. Mahir256 (talk) 17:32, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]- Oppose but recommend a property like this for use on verb lexemes per above. “Derivational class” seems to be a common English label for these categories. It also looks like the items used in these proposal examples can be merged with existing ones such as Form I (Q56070812). While these are currently linked with the conjugation class (P5186), a separate property would be more appropriate and technically accurate since these aren't exactly conjugation classes. -عُثمان (talk) 17:53, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]