Wikidata:Property proposal/Audiomack sang-ID - Wikidata
Return to Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
Proposing on behalf of user 1000mm. I assume planned use is for external links templates on nowiki, but it seems consistent with other music-related external identificators. EdoAug (talk) 14:39, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
: Oppose"Audiomack song ID" 2/3 of the examples you used are for singles and the last is for a musical composition Trade (talk) 22:58, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm more interested in the album and artist IDs from the same catalog. I'm not super involved in music terminology. The "musical composition", does have "creative format: song", while the others also have "instance of: audio track (Q7302866)", which is up for interpretation. EdoAug (talk) 18:05, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- If you have any questions regarding the modeling of musical items on Wikidata you should go and ask Moebeus about it Trade (talk) 18:10, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Would you mind if i change the examples listed to more appropriate ones? Trade (talk) 18:10, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Trade: Please do, if you have any in mind! EdoAug (talk) 18:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- If you look at the new examples you can see that they all share the same "instance of". No singles or compositions Trade (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Trade: Please do, if you have any in mind! EdoAug (talk) 18:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm more interested in the album and artist IDs from the same catalog. I'm not super involved in music terminology. The "musical composition", does have "creative format: song", while the others also have "instance of: audio track (Q7302866)", which is up for interpretation. EdoAug (talk) 18:05, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @EdoAug:--Trade (talk) 01:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Trade (talk) 12:48, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]