zbmath.org

Document Zbl 1425.62037 - zbMATH Open

Estimation after selection from gamma populations with unequal known shape parameters. (English) Zbl 1425.62037

Summary: Let \(\pi_1,\dots,\pi_k\) be \(k\) (\(\geq 2\)) independent gamma populations, where the population \(\pi_i\) has an unknown scale parameter \(\theta_i>0\) and known shape parameter \(\nu_i > 0\), \(i = 1,{\dots}, k\). We call the population associated with \(\mu_{[k]} = \max\{\mu_1,\dots,\mu_k\}\), \(\mu_i = \nu_i\theta_i\) the best population. For the goal of selecting the best population, the first two authors [Stat. Methodol. 18, 41–63 (2014; Zbl 1486.62059)] proposed a class \(\mathcal{D}_{0}\) of selection rules for the case of (possibly) unequal shape parameters. In this article, we consider the problem of estimating the mean \(\mu_S\) of the population selected by a fixed selection rule \(\underline{\delta}^{\overline{a}} \in \mathcal{D}_0\), under a scale-invariant loss function. We derive the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE). Two other natural estimators \(\varphi_{N,1}\) and \(\varphi_{N,2}\), which are respectively the analogs of the UMVUE and the best scale invariant estimators of \(\mu_i\)’s for the component problem, are studied. We show that \(\varphi_{N,2}\) is generalized Bayes with respect to a noninformative prior distribution, and is also minimax when \(k = 2\). The UMVUE and the natural estimator \(\varphi_{N,1}\) are shown to be inadmissible, and better estimators are obtained. A numerical study on the performance of various estimators indicates that the natural estimator \(\varphi_{N,2}\) outperforms the other natural estimators.


MSC:

62F07 Statistical ranking and selection procedures
62F10 Point estimation
62C20 Minimax procedures in statistical decision theory

References:

[1] Abughalous, M. M., and N. K. Bansal. 1994. On the problem of selecting the best population in life testing models. Communi. Stat. Theory Methods, 23(5), 1471-1481. · Zbl 0825.62159 · doi:10.1080/03610929408831334
[2] Bahadur, R. R., and L. A. Goodman. 1952. Impartial decision rules and sufficient statistics. Ann. Math. Stat., 23, 553-562. · Zbl 0048.11902 · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729334
[3] Bansal, N. K., and K. J. Miescke. 2002. Simultaneous selection and estimation in general linear models. J. Stat. Plan. Inference, 104(2), 377-390. · Zbl 0992.62022 · doi:10.1016/S0378-3758(01)00262-2
[4] Bansal, N. K., and K. J. Miescke. 2005. Simultaneous selection and estimation of the best treatment with respect to a control in a general linear model. J. Stat. Plan. Inference, 109(1-2), 387-404. · Zbl 1062.62034 · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2004.06.035
[5] Brewster, J. F., and Z. V. Zidek. 1974. Improving on equivarient estimators. Ann. Stat., 2, 21-38. · Zbl 0275.62006 · doi:10.1214/aos/1176342610
[6] Cohen, A.; Sackrowitz, H. B., A decision theory formulation for population selection followed by estimating the mean of the selected population, 33-36 (1988), New York, NY · Zbl 0678.62014 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3818-8_3
[7] Eaton, M. L. 1967. Some Optimum Properties of Ranking Procedures. Ann. Math. Stat., 38, 124-137. · Zbl 0155.25202 · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177699063
[8] Gangopadhyay, A. K., and S. Kumar, 2005. Estimating average worth of the selected subset from two-parameter exponential populations. Communi. Stat. Theory Methods, 34(12), 2257-2267. · Zbl 1079.62028 · doi:10.1080/03610920500257220
[9] Kumar, S., A. K. Mahapatra, and P. Vellaisamy. 2009. Reliability estimation of the selected exponential populations. Stat. Probability Lett., 79, 1372-1377. · Zbl 1163.62015 · doi:10.1016/j.spl.2009.02.012
[10] Misra, N. 1994. Estimation of the average worth of the selected subset of gamma populations. Sankhyā Indian J. Stat., Ser. B, 56, 344-355. · Zbl 0835.62026
[11] Misra, N., and M. Arshad, 2014. Selecting the best of two gamma populations having unequal shape parameters. Stat. Methodol., 18, 41-63. · Zbl 1486.62059 · doi:10.1016/j.stamet.2013.08.008
[12] Misra, N., and I. D. Dhariyal. 1994. Non-minimaxity of natural decision rules under heteroscedasticity. Stat. Decisions, 12, 79-89. · Zbl 0802.62025
[13] Misra, N., E. C. van der Meulen, and K. V. Branden. 2006a. On estimating the scale parameter of the selected gamma population under the scale invariant squared error loss function. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 186, 268-282. · Zbl 1073.62006 · doi:10.1016/j.cam.2005.03.074
[14] Misra, N., E. C. van der Meulen, and K. V. Branden. 2006b. On some inadmissibility results for the scale parameters of the selected gamma populations. J. Stat. Plan. Inference, 136(7), 2340-2351. · Zbl 1089.62003 · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2005.08.020
[15] Motamed-Shariati, F., and N. Nematollahi. 2009. Minimax estimation of the scale parameter of the selected gamma population with arbitrary known shape parameter. Appl. Math. Sci., 3(51), 2543-2552. · Zbl 1185.62020
[16] Nematollahi, N., and F. Motamed-Shariati. 2009. Estimation of the scale parameter of the selected gamma population under the entropy loss function. Communi. Stat. Theory Methods, 38(2), 208-221. · Zbl 1292.62040 · doi:10.1080/03610920802187422
[17] Nematollahi, N., and F. Motamed-Shariati, 2012. Estimation of the parameter of the selected uniform population under the entropy loss function. J. Stat. Plan. Inference, 142(7), 2190-2202. · Zbl 1408.62039 · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2012.01.016
[18] Sackrowitz, H. B., and E. Samuel-Cahn. 1984. Estimation of the mean of a selected population. Technical report no. 165, Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. · Zbl 0547.62015
[19] Sackrowitz, H. B., and E. Samuel-Cahn, 1986. Evaluating the chosen population: A Bayes and minimax approach. Adaptive Statistical Procedures and Related Topics, IMS Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, 8, 386-399. · Zbl 0679.62006 · doi:10.1214/lnms/1215540314
[20] Stallard, N., S. Todd, and J. Whitehead. 2008. Estimation following selection of the largest of two normal means. J. Stat. Plan. Inference, 138(6), 1629-1638. · Zbl 1131.62104 · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2007.05.045
[21] Vellaisamy, P. 1992a. Average worth and simultaneous estimation of the selected subset. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math., 44, 551-562. · Zbl 0763.62011
[22] Vellaisamy, P. 1992b. Inadmissibility results for the selected scale parameter. Ann. Stat., 20, 2183-2191. · Zbl 0765.62012 · doi:10.1214/aos/1176348913
[23] Vellaisamy, P., and D. Sharma. 1988. Estimation of the mean of the selected gamma population. Communi. Stat. Theory Methods, 17(8), 2797-2817. · Zbl 0696.62103 · doi:10.1080/03610928808829772
[24] Vellaisamy, P., and D. Sharma. 1989. A note on the estimation of the mean of the selected gamma population. Communi. Stat. Theory Methods, 18(2), 555-560. · Zbl 0696.62094 · doi:10.1080/03610928908829918

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.